Hell

     The previous essay gives one reason why I am a gnu atheist! Only a  pathological mind could produce such a dogma! The writers who  brag about Hell just made it up from their meaningless, morbid misanthropy. They all deserve contempt! How they have tortured others!
 Nothing will ever punish them for their cruelty. We rationalists hope that this dogma will exert less and less its ugliness as time goes by.
      Ti's not the genetic fallacy to find this dogma hateful f rom their misanthropy but hateful in itself.
      Yes, no evidence appears for Hell and none for God.
      Those misanthropes  just made up things as they desired. They had no concern for evidence, as most people were and are superstitious and thus, this superstition could influence many. It has no more reality than the fear of black cats crossing paths has!
      Other versions of Hell also merit derision! The annihilationist view is that at the judgment day, God will annihilate the evil ones. Why not just let them stay dead?
       John Hick tells us that why, Yeshua just wanted to use this as a metaphor to urge people to do good. What a rationalization by the late Hick, that ever-ready rationalizer!
       What makes you a gnu atheist should  you be one? Is the dogma of Hell sufficient? Do you dissent?